|
“The
Top Ten Errors Found in The Da Vinci Code”
Sermon
#2 - Errors 3-7: The
Authority of Scripture
| Pastor Wes Johnson |
April 30, 2006 |
Selected Scriptures |
Error
#3: "You
can't trust the Bible ... it's only a human book."
| Dan
Brown has his character Sir Leigh Teabing claim that the Bible was
"hodge-podged" together over time and is not
trustworthy: |
|
Teabing
cleared his throat and declared, "The Bible did not arrive by
fax from heaven."
"I beg your pardon?"
[Sophie asked]
"The
Bible is a product of man, my dear. Not of God. The Bible
did not fall magically from the clouds. Man created it as a
historical record of tumultuous times, and it has evolved through
countless translations, additions, and revisions. History has
never had a definitive version of the book.” (DVC,
Paperback, pp. 250-251) |
| Answer:
God moved holy men to write what He intended. |
|
It is true that the Bible
did not arrive by magic from heaven. Rather, God moved selected
writers over a period of 1500 years to write what he intended. The
result has been nothing short of miraculous.
“The Bible is the greatest work of literature, history
and theology ever written. In its production, preservation and
proclamation, and product, (changed history, changed lives) it
stands as the most unique book in existence. It is a unity out of
a diversity of authors, time span, and literary forms. The Old and
New Testaments smoothly blend to create a bold sweep from eternity
past to eternity future, from the heights of heaven to the depths
of hell. In these sixty-six books, we discover our past,
understand our present and attain hope for our future.” Bruce
Wilkinson, Kenneth Boa, Talk Through the Bible, pg 1. |
|
2 Peter 1:20-21 |
|
20
Above all, you must understand that no prophecy of
Scripture came about by the prophet's own interpretation. 21
For prophecy never had its origin in the will of man, but
men spoke from God as they were carried along by the Holy Spirit.
|
|
2 Timothy 3:16-17 |
|
16
All Scripture is God-breathed and is useful for teaching,
rebuking, correcting and training in righteousness, 17
so that the man of God may be thoroughly equipped for every
good work.
|
| God
inspired the Bible. It is his message to mankind. It
is not the creation of religious teachers or philosophers. |
|
Alex McFarland
writes, “If men wanted to create a new religion, they would
never choose one with a God-man as its central figure and a
resurrection from the dead as its foundation. (1 Corinthians
15:14, Ephesians 2:20). Further, if men had produced Christianity,
it would be man-centered, as are all other religions. In other
words, man would earn his way into eternal bliss through his good
deeds. Thus, man would get the glory. In stark contrast, the Bible
uniformly declares that man cannot
work his way to God. There must be a substitute that is acceptable
to God according to His holy standard — perfect
righteousness. Jesus Christ is that perfect substitute
— the one and only way to God. Therefore, God gets all the
glory. (Isaiah 64:6, Philippians 3:9, 2 Corinthians 5:21, 1 Peter
3:18). Alex
McFarland, The Top 10
Errors Found in 'The Da Vinci Code,' http://go.family.org/davinci/content/A000000061.cfm
|
Error
#4: "The original meaning of the Bible has been lost through
countless translations and revisions."
| Teabing
again: |
|
"The
Bible ... has evolved through countless translations, additions,
and revisions. History has never had a definitive version of
the book." (DVC, Paperback, pp. 250-251) The Bible has been extensively rewritten and revised.
Therefore, its original meaning has been lost. The Christian
Scriptures "evolved through countless translations,
additions, and revisions." (DVC, p.231) |
| We
have one spiritual answer, and two scholarly answers, for this
point. |
| Answer:
The Lord who gave his Word has preserved his Word. |
|
Isaiah 55:10-11 |
|
10
As the rain and the snow come down from heaven, and do not return
to it without watering the earth and making it bud and flourish,
so that it yields seed for the sower and bread for the eater, 11
so is my word that goes out from my mouth: It will not return to
me empty, but will accomplish what I desire and achieve the
purpose for which I sent it. |
|
Isaiah 40:8 |
|
8
The grass withers and the flowers fall, but the word of our God
stands forever. |
| The
word of the Lord will stand. It has been his purpose not only to
reveal his word, but to protect his word through the ages.
|
| Answer:
The Dead Sea Scrolls show that the Hebrew Old Testament was
remarkably preserved. |
| Teabing
says regarding the Dead Sea Scrolls: |
|
"The Dead Sea Scrolls were found in the 1950’s
hidden in a cave near Qumran in the
Judean
Desert
. …The scrolls highlighted the glaring historical discrepancies
and fabrications, clearly confirming that the modern Bible was
compiled and edited by men who possessed a political agenda—to
promote the divinity of the man Jesus Christ and use his influence
to solidify their power base." (DVC, Paperback, p.
254) |
| Facts
about the Dead Sea Scrolls: |
|
The
Dead Sea
Scrolls were discovered in 1947.
At that time, the earliest dated manuscript we had of the Old
Testament was the Masoretic Text, which dated to about the tenth
Century AD.
The Dead Sea
Scrolls contained no gospels, nor any reference to Jesus. They
contained portions of every Old Testament book except Esther,
commentaries on the Old Testament, some extrabiblical works,
secular documents and business records.
Scholars
compared the writing in the scrolls to the writing in the
Masoretic text, and found that it to be remarkably unchanged for
more than 1,000 years of copying. You can have a high degree of
confidence that the Old Testament that we have today is very close
indeed to the ancient text as it first came down to the Church.
|
| Answer:
Scholars confirm the reliability of the New Testament. |
| Daniel
B. Wallace is a professor at Dallas Theological Seminary. He
made me [Pastor Wes] suffer through New Testament Greek. He
has written an online article entitled, "Has God Preserved
His Word?" |
|
The original writers of the New Testament
wrote in Greek. Paul and Peter and John and James wrote their
letters, Mathew Mark, Luke and John wrote their Gospels, and these
circulated throughout the churches. Copies were carefully written
and preserved. Today we have over 5,600 manuscript copies of the
Greek New Testament, more than for any other ancient document. In
addition we have thousands of copies in Latin, Coptic, Syriac and
other ancient translations. But there are variances between the
copies. Some copies have differences in spelling. Some
have differences in word choice that involve synonyms. These do
not affect translation. Some copies have meaningful differences, but under study and scrutiny,
the differences do not hold up.
Dan Wallace states, "There are about 20 copies of the average ancient Greek author's
writings. Altogether, the manuscripts of the New Testament are
approximately 1,000 times more plentiful than the copies of the
average ancient Greek writer. The New Testament manuscripts stand
closer to the original and are more plentiful than any other Greek
or Latin literature."
Remarkably,
of all the variant readings, there is not a single viable one that
alters a fundamental of the Christian faith. Why, if we didn't
know better, we might be tempted to think that God's providence
was somehow involved!
"The
deity of Christ is affirmed in the earliest manuscripts just as it
is in the later ones; He rises bodily from the dead in all the
Gospel manuscripts; and salvation is always by grace alone. We may
not know the original wording in every place, but we can have
confidence that no fundamental truth has been tampered with. In
spite of those who make outlandish claims otherwise, the evidence
is all on the side of the truth. What you have in your hands today
is essentially what was written back then." 2 Daniel
Wallace, "Has God Preserved His Word?" http://go.family.org/davinci/content/A000000061.cfm
(2 For
a detailed examination of the claims of The Da Vinci Code
that the New Testament text has been tampered with, see J. Ed
Komoszewski, M. James Sawyer, and Daniel B. Wallace, Reinventing Jesus: What The Da
Vinci Code and Other Novel Speculations Don't Tell You
(Grand Rapids: Kregel Publications, not yet published). |
Error #5: "The Bible as
we know it was compiled by a pagan Roman Emperor."
| Answer:
Constantine was a Christian -- and he did not compile the Bible. |
|
Facts
About Constantine: Although the jury is out as to whether
Constantine
was a true follower of Christ, he was not a pagan. He converted to
Christianity (regardless of his motives for doing so). And he did
not collate the Bible. The Old Testament was compiled even before
the time of Jesus. The New Testament began to be recognized by the
end of the 1st century. By the 2nd century, church leaders were
inserting quotes from the four Gospels into their writings.
Athanasius recorded the earliest list of New Testament books in
367 A.D.
"Constantine
is perhaps best known for being the first Roman Emperor to freely
allow Christianity.
Christian
historians
ever since Lactantius have adhered to the view that
Constantine
'adopted' Christianity as a kind of replacement for the
official Roman polytheism. Though he was not baptized until
he was on his deathbed, his conversion, according to the sources,
was the immediate result of an omen before his victory in the
Battle of Milvian Bridge, on October 28, 312. Upon seeing this
vision,
Constantine
is said to have instituted a new standard to be carried into
battle called the labarum. This vision seen by
Constantine
was made up of two events. Firstly, while marching with his
soldiers he saw the shape of an ambigram cross with the words
"in this sign you will conquer" in front of the sun.
After seeing that he had a dream instructing him to put a new sign
as the standard. It is said that after this event Constantine
was immediately converted to Christianity."
"Constantine
is best remembered in modern times for the Edict of Milan in 313
and the Council of Nicaea in 325, which fully legalized Christianity
in the Empire for the first time; these actions are considered
major factors in the spreading of the religion. His reputation as
the 'first Christian Emperor' has been promulgated by
historians from Lactantius
and
Eusebius of Caesarea to the present day; although there has been
debate over the veracity of his faith because he was baptized only
on his death bed, this was in fact a reasonably common practice at
the time ... " http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Constantine_I_of_the_Roman_Empire
|
Error #6: "The Church
compiled the Bible at the Council of Nicea in 325 AD."
| The
Da Vinci Code asserts that because Jesus wasn’t recognized
as the divine Son of God until the Council of Nicea (a huge
error—see Sermon #1), the emperor had to change the Bible to get
this view across. |
|
"The twist is this," Teabing said, talking
faster now. "Because Constantine
upgraded Jesus’ status almost four centuries after Jesus' death,
thousands of documents already existed, chronicling his life as a
mortal man. To rewrite the history books, Constantine
knew he would need a bold stroke. From this sprang the most
profound moment in church history." Teabing paused, eyeing
Sophie. "Constantine
commissioned and financed a new Bible, which omitted those gospels
that spoke of Christ's human traits and embellished those gospels
that made him godlike. The earlier gospels were outlawed, gathered
up, and burned." (DVC, Paperback, p. 254) |
| Answer:
Jewish scholars agree that the Old Testament books were completed
400 years before Christ (725 years before Nicea). |
|
"At
the council of Jamnia in 90 AD, the Old Testament books were
ratified... The authentic books had proved their worth; the wheat
had been separated from the chaff." Dr. Erwin W. Lutzer, The Da
Vinci Deception, p. 86)
|
| Answer:
The
Council of Nicea never discussed nor voted on the list of New
Testament books.
|
|
"Historical works on Nicea give
no evidence that Constantine and the delegates even discussed the
Gnostic Gospels or anything that pertained to the canon (the list
of NT Books)….Twenty rulings were issued at Nicea, and the
contents of all of them are still in existence; not one of them
refers to issues regarding the canon." (Lutzer, p. 19)
Rather,
God’s people at large confirmed the authenticity of the New
Testament Scriptures. |
| Answer:
As early as the first century, the Church recognized certain
writings as bearing the stamp of the Holy Spirit. |
|
2 Peter 3:15-16 |
|
15
Bear in mind that our Lord's patience means salvation, just
as our dear brother Paul also wrote you with the wisdom that God
gave him. 16 He writes the
same way in all his letters, speaking in them of these matters.
His letters contain some things that are hard to understand, which
ignorant and unstable people distort, as they do the other
Scriptures, to their own destruction.
|
| The
church recognized certain writings through the witness of the Holy
Spirit. The Spirit confirmed to Peter that what Paul wrote was
indeed Holy Scripture. By the year 180 AD, the church was quoting
freely from the four gospels. Three basic tests determined if a
writing was Scripture or not: |
|
1. Did an
apostle or his representative write this document? |
|
2. Is this
writing consistent with the Old Testament prophets and the
teaching of the other apostles? |
|
3. Has this
writing been widely and continually accepted by the churches of
Christ? |
Error #7: "Constantine
excluded over 80 gospels from the Bible that show that Jesus was only a
man, and not divine."
|
Teabing paused to sip his tea and then placed the
cup back on the mantle. "More than eighty gospels were
considered for the New Testament, and yet only a relative few were
chosen for inclusion—Matthew, Mark, Luke and John among
them." (DVC, Paperback, p. 251) |
| Answer:
There were actually 52 Gnostic gospels, and they present Jesus as
more spiritual than human. None of them were ever considered
for inclusion in the Bible. |
|
The
gospels to which Brown (through Teabing) refers are the Gnostic
gospels. They were written from about 250-350 AD, hundreds of
years after Christ lived, to reinterpret the life and teachings of
Christ, based upon Gnostic philosophy (see endnote).
There were never as many as eighty, and they were never considered
for inclusion in the New Testament.
Matthew, Mark,
Luke and John were accepted in the first century based upon their
authorship and their use in the early Christian centers of
Jerusalem, Antioch, Alexandria and Rome. |
| Answer:
God Himself validates His Word. |
|
Jeremiah 23:21,
28-29 |
|
21
I did not send these prophets, yet they have run with their
message; I did not speak to them, yet they have prophesied.
28
"Let the prophet who has a dream tell his dream, but let the
one who has my word speak it faithfully. For what has straw to do
with grain?" declares the LORD.
29
"Is not my word like fire," declares the LORD, "and
like a hammer that breaks a rock in pieces?
|
|
And
the best validation of all is what happens to you when you read
it, discover it, pray it, apply it. Your life will change forever.
Your eternal destination will change from hell to heaven. Your
heart will change from dark to light.
If
you want to know God, invest the strength of your soul in this
Book of Books.
It
will transform you. |
ENDNOTE:
Christian Teaching vs. Gnostic
|
Christian |
Gnostic |
| Salvation |
All
who put their faith in Christ |
Those
who attain secret "Gnosis" (knowledge) |
| The Cross |
Jesus
died on the cross for the sins of humanity |
Jesus
did not die on the cross ... a phantom or subsitute died on the
cross |
| Old Testament |
Christ
was God in the Old Testament ... who entered humanity (John 1:18) |
The
God of the Old Testament is a demon who has trapped spirit beings
in physical bodies |
| Jesus' Existence |
Jesus
was God from eternity past, dwelling in flesh |
Jesus
came into existence from All-father and Sophia (goddess) |
| Source:
www.debunkingdavinci.com |
|